Editorial Vol I Issue 01

Sukhwinder Singh, Amandeep Singh

Abstract 

The task to revive classical modes of understanding religion and philosophy while avoiding any alienation of contemporary modes of knowledge production has led us to think differently. While maintaining a high hope of 'recentering' the epistemological position in unfolding of the Truth, we are also aware of the uphill contentions, particularly in post-Hegelian philosophical modes of theorization, that have made it nearly impossible to retrieve or reimagine religion and philosophy beyond historical loadings of identities of language, ethnicity, anthropology, and genealogy.
    To understand the complexities of our landscape, let us take a closer look at the domain of Sikh studies. This domain has undergone many ebbs and tides of knowledge production in the past century, particularly after the Singh Sabha reform movement that was initiated with the historical encounter between the colonizer and colonized during last quarter of nineteenth and first quarter of twentieth century. Sikh subjectivity has since undergone a drastic shift towards a colonial understanding of religion and identity, leading to historicization of Sikh imagination and the rationalization of doctrinal understandings. While scholars of this age, particularly Bhai Vir Singh, focused on preserving the essence of Sikh spirit by employing what can be termed as 'transparent metaphysics', he also remained unbound by any form of ethnic, lingual, or historical identity constructions. However, his concentrated focus on the meta-historical relationship with Sikh Gurüs and Gurbäni has been recently interpreted as a covert call for metaphysical construction of religious identity. His works have been inappropriately criticized as an effort to canonize Sikh studies with a linguo-religious ideology - a theoretical claim that hardly finds any resonance in the native Sikh imagination...
Download PDF

More Articles

    Shopping Cart
    Scroll to Top